By the letter of the law, Declan Rice's second yellow for Arsenal vs Brighton was correct. But here are five reasons why he was right to be "shocked" by his dismissal...
The England midfielder was given his marching orders by Chris Kavanagh four minutes after half-time for kicking the ball away and delaying the restart of play after he fouled Joel Veltman.
There is no question the Arsenal man touched the ball to take it away from Veltman as he made a movement to take the free-kick he had just been awarded, with the Brighton defender eventually catching Rice instead.
- Ref Watch: Dermot Gallagher's view on Declan Rice red
- Arsenal 1-1 Brighton - Match report and highlights
- Live Premier League table | Watch PL highlights for free
But watch the incident back a few times, and there are a few questions to be asked whether a yellow card, especially leading to a red, was the best form of punishment.
Monterosa This content is provided by Monterosa, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Monterosa cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options. Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Monterosa cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Monterosa cookies for this session only.
Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once
What do the Laws of the Game say?
From Law 12: Fouls and Misconduct
Referees must caution players who delay the restart of play by:
- appearing to take a throw-in but suddenly leaving it to a team-mate to take
- delaying leaving the field of play when being substituted
- excessively delaying a restart
- kicking or carrying the ball away, or provoking a confrontation by deliberately touching the ball after the referee has stopped play
- taking a free kick from the wrong position to force a retake
Reason 1: If Joao Pedro can do it...
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Before half-time, Joao Pedro booted the ball away after the ball had gone out near the half-way line, in an incident arguably worse than Rice's given the relative length of delay from how far his kick travelled.
Trending
- Transfer Centre: 'Real Madrid make Rodri a priority target'
- Papers: Eze's £68m Palace release clause to reactivate next year
- PL clears Chelsea's £76m sale of hotels to avoid PSR breach
- Mitchell defends Newcastle business after failed Guehi, Elanga bids
- Bellingham among six England players nominated for Ballon d'Or
- Man Utd rumours: Casemiro wants to fight for future amid Turkey links
- Angel Gomes: England's new starlet that Man Utd let go
- The million-dollar question: Does Haaland do enough?
- Arsenal news: Tierney included in Champions League squad
- Newey set to join Aston Martin in 2025
- Watch
- Latest News
Unlike Rice, Pedro wasn't penalised, or even spoken to, by Kavanagh. It's not exactly the first incident of refereeing inconsistency in Premier League history, but why did Pedro get off scot-free while Rice was sent for an early bath?
Dean: Referee has no choice, Veltman's been clever
Former Premier League referee Mike Dean on Soccer Saturday:
"Unfortunately for Declan, he's kicked the ball away. He hasn't kicked it far, but they've been told before the start of the season - kick it away, delay the restart, you'll be cautioned.
"He's already on a yellow card, the referee's got no choice but to send him off.
"He's delayed the restart because the Brighton defender wants to get it going quickly. He's been very, very clever because he knows what's going to happen."
Reason 2: The ball was moving when Rice touched it
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
This one should kill the whole argument dead. Watch the video above of the incident which saw Rice sent off, and you'll see the ball clearly moving before Rice nudges it away.
Also See:
- Live Premier League table
-
Get Sky Sports
-
Stream Sky Sports on NOW
So even if Veltman had made contact with the ball, rather than Rice, and managed to take the quick free-kick, then if we're doing everything by the letter of the law, then let me draw your attention to Law 13.2 regarding free-kicks.
"The ball must be stationary and the kicker must not touch the ball again until it has touched another player."
With that being the case, the free-kick would have had to be taken again anyway.
Reason 3: How much did Rice really delay things?
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Consider Pedro's first-half welly. Getting the ball back to where it was needed to restart play would have taken a good little while. For this incident? The ball had barely moved a yard by the time Veltman attempted to take it.
It was so close, Veltman could have stuck a boot out and rolled it back to where the original offence occurred had he been so inclined. Compared to a goalkeeper diving on a ball and lying on it for 15 seconds, it was hardly a criminal offence.
Reason 4: Webb said not to overreact...
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Have a little read of what referee chief Howard Webb said on Mic'd Up last season referees shouldn't overreact
"[Michael Oliver] doesn't want to have a negative impact on the game by overreacting to something," he said. "Sometimes players will be on a yellow card, and there will be pressure to show another one from the players on the field."
You can decide for yourself whether Kavanagh could have been more cautious before brandishing a second yellow. But you might decide overreaction is the right word for how things transpired...
While we're at it, if the referee was feeling particularly upstanding about the laws that day, why wasn't Bart Verbruggen cautioned for running over to him to insist Rice was shown a second yellow card?
Blackburn striker Makhtar Gueye might wonder the same thing, after he was given a second yellow for doing exactly that to Tony Harrington in their game with Burnley on Saturday afternon.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Reason 5: Is Veltman even trying to restart play?
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Far be it from us to question Veltman's motives, but there is a case that he knows very well he is going to make contact with Rice rather than the ball when he attempts to restart play, in which case the Arsenal man has effectively been sent off for getting kicked.
The defender's movement is that of a player attempting a long ball - but all of his team-mates are well inside their own half and Brighton are certainly not in the sport of launching aimless balls downfield.
With that in mind, was Veltman's demonstrative action just designed to draw Kavanagh's attention to Rice's kick? We couldn't say, so we'll defer to a man who's run the rule over more than a few Premier League games, Mike Dean.
"The defender's been very, very clever," he told Soccer Saturday. "He knows what's going to happen."
Veltman might have known what was going to happen - but you can understand why Rice, who has never had a red card before in his career, didn't expect to be given his marching orders over such a minor incident.